The death penalty itself has never stopped a crime and only serves to satisfy the blood lust of those who support it….it sends a ludicrous message: killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong…
and if that weren’t clearly enough….
when the possibility exists that innocent men and women may be put to death, how can one advocate it’s use?
KILLING is only rectified for food ONLY (and excludes usually fellow species members).
All other ‘reasons’ don’t deserve this term because they are unreasonable.
And, if possible, you should kill and prepare your prey yourself (and saying inside ‘good bye’ to your prey before sending it to Summerland).
Thus it is avoided that there will be a ‘killing for money industry.
But that is the future (so I hope).
I am imploring eberybody who reads this blog to become equally active in abolishing the ‘death penalty’
(actually, it is not a penalty at all – because the main purpose for a ‘penalty’ is, to make the perpetrator ‘better’ – but, in conducting this, the perpetrator is simply dead afterwards, not better.
So, even the term/word is unreasonable – much more the deed itself. Luckily most European countries have abolished this scandal already or at least are no longer executing it…